When President Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ announced employers, including religious
organizations, must provide women’s reproductive services through insurance, the
national debate quickly shifted from the morning-after and abortion pills, to traditional
contraception.
In media terms,
that’s “spin” and the truth about the morning-after pill vanished.
Obama is trying to
make us think businesses and religions can opt out of the requirement.
Regulators now solicit public input on how to implement the mandate—an
appearance of openness while doing nothing.
I visited Planned Parenthood as a reporter, probably in 1994
or 1995, when I first heard of the “morning-after” pill being used in the
United States.
The way I understand it, when the Food and Drug
Administration wouldn’t approve the abortion pill RU-486 for use in the United
States, Dr. Carl Djerassi, who helped develop the first oral contraceptive pill
and founder of Planned Parenthood, decided a large dose of birth control pills
would keep a fertilized egg from attaching to the womb, and thus he invented
the “morning after pill.” Planned Parenthood began offering the treatment for
women within 72 hours of unprotected sex, although the medication hadn’t been
approved for that use and women sometimes had significant side effects.
The morning-after
medication causes the uterus to shed its lining, preventing a fertilized egg from
attaching to the womb. The dosage also might cause a woman not to ovulate.
Planned Parenthood claimed until the fertilized egg attaches
to the womb, the woman is not pregnant, and that’s true. But invitro
fertilization shows a fertilized egg is pregnant
with life before implantation in the womb.
Certainly not everyone who takes morning-after pills has a
fertilized egg bursting to life and searching for a safe place in the womb. But
some do—and that’s the reason for the pill—to prevent another person from
entering this world.
Christians, among them Evangelicals, Catholics and many others believe “Thou
Shalt Not Kill” in the Sixth Commandment includes the unborn. People are
speaking out against the requirement, even after Obama transferred responsibility
to insurance companies.
The U.S. Catholic bishops noted the full range of
contraceptives approved by the FDA that would be available without any co-pay under
Obama Care included “drugs which can attack a developing unborn child before
and after implantation in the mother’s womb.
Yet, because of the world’s exploding population, population
control is a goal of many in government. The number of people on earth who need
food is worrisome, but it’s not a reason to kill—or to force people, especially
those whose conscience or religion forbids it, to assist with the killing.
If killing were the
answer to earth’s problems why do we worry about genocide in Syria, Ruwanda,
and other places? We know in our gut it is wrong and horrific.
I suggest our citizens learn self control where sexuality is
concerned, not population control.